Aspects of the relationship between the processing of stimuli in the peripheral perceptual field and in the perceptual central field

Mihai Aniţei, Cornel Mincu, Mihaela Chraif

Abstract


As humans have limited information processing abilities and rely on three fallible mental functions: perception, attention and memory, the driving error is easy to appear. The purpose of this paper is to highlight the male/female differences in processing the perceptive information from the external stimuli in the peripheral visual field and to demonstrate that the mean of the estimate errors in evaluating the speed and distances in the central visual perceptual field is in inverse ratio to the reaction time value at the visual stimuli from the peripheral driving tasks simulation. Between the variables number of wrong reactions and number of omissions there has been obtained a relatively high negative correlation (r=-0.728, p<0.001). The result has a strong implication in visual stimuli processing during driving tasks.


Keywords


peripheral stimuli processing; gender differences; perceptual visual central field; central visual stimuli processing;

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aasman, J. (1995). Modeling driver behavior in Soar. Leidschendam, the Netherlands: KPN Research.

Anderson, S.J., & Holliday, I.E. (1995). Night driving: effects of glare from vehicle headlights on motion perception. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics, 15, 545-551.

Anderson, R. A., Snyder, L. H., Bradley, D. C., & Xing, J. (1997). Multimodal representation of space in the posterior parietal cortex and its use in planning movements. Annual Review of Neuroscience, 29, 303-330.

Ando, S., Kida, N., & Oda., S. (2002). Practice effects on reaction time for peripheral and central visual fields. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 95, 3, 747-752.

Ando, S., Kida, N., & Oda., S. (2004). Retention of practice effects on simple reaction time for peripheral and central visual fields. Perceptual and Motor Skills, 98, 3, 897-900.

Aniţei, M., Buzea, L. & Chraif P.M. (2007). Correlative study between the motor reactivity and the speed reaction and processing distances in vehicle driving simulation tasks, Centenary of Psychology at the University of Bucharest, part.2, 519-528.

Aniţei, M., & Chraif P. M. (2007). The influence of Caffeine Addiction in Speed and Distances Appreciation during driving a Vehicle, Centenary of Psychology at the University of Bucharest, part.1, 257-265.

Bar, M., & Ullman, S. (1996). Spatial context in recognition. Perception, 25, 343-352.

Barthélémy, S., & Boulinguez, P. (2001). Manual reaction time asymmetries in human subjects: the role of movement planning and attention. Neuroscience Letters, 315, 1, 41-44.

Barthélémy, S., & Boulinguez, P. (2002). Orienting visuospatial attention generates manual reaction time asymmetries in target detection and pointing. Behavioral Brain Research 133, 1, 109-116.

Bavelier, D., Tomann, A., Hutton, C., Mitchell, T., Corina, D., Liu, G., & Neville, H. (2000). Visual Attention to the Periphery Is Enhanced in Congenitally Deaf Individuals, The Journal of Neuroscience, 20, 1-6.

Brebner, J.T., & Welford, A.T. (1980). Introduction: an historical background sketch. Reaction Times. New York: Academic Press, 1-23.

Bryden, P. (2002). Pushing the limits of task difficulty for the right and left hands in manual aiming. Brain and Cognition, 48, 2-3, 287-291.

Caplan, P.J., MacPherson, G.M., & Tobin, P. (1985). Do sex-related differences in spatial abilities exist? A multilevel critique with new data. American Psychologist, 40, 786-799.

Dane, S. & Erzurumluoglu, A. (2003). Sex and handedness differences in eye-hand visual reaction times in handball players. International Journal of Neuroscience 113, 7, 923-929.

Downing, C.J. (1988). Expectancy and visual-spatial attention: Effects on perceptual quality. Journal of Experimental Psychology. Human, Perception, Performances. 14, 188-202.

Driver, J., & Spence, C. (1998). Cross-modal links in spatial attention. Philosophical Transactions Royal Society London BilogicalSciences, 353, 1319-1331.

Eals, M., & Silverman, I. (1994). The hunter-gatherer theory of spatial sex differences: Proximate factors mediating the female advantage in recall of object arrays. Ethology & Sociobiology, 15, 95-105.

Gilden, D. L., Blake, R., & Hurst, G. (1995). Neural adaptation of imaginary visual motion. Cognitive Psychology, 28, 1-16.

Green, M. (1992). Visual Search: detection, identification and localization. Perception, 21, 765-777.

Green, M. (2000). ’How long does it take to stop?’ Analysis of brake reaction times,” Transportation Human Factors, 2, 195-216.

Green, M. (2001). The psychology of warnings. Occupational Health and Safety Canada, 30-38.

Hakamies-Blomqvist, L., Raitanen, T., & O'Neill, D. (2002). Driver ageing does not cause higher accident rates per km., Transportation Research Part F: Traffic Psychology and Behaviour, 5, 271-274.

Haigh, R. (1993).The aging process: A challenge for design. Applied Ergonomics, 24,1, 9- 14.

Hess, R.F., Dakin, S.C., Kapoor, N., & Tewfik, M. (2000). Contour interaction in fovea and periphery. Journal of the Optical Society of America A., 17, 1516–1524.

Kimura, D. (1999). Sex and Cognition, Cambridge, Mass: A Bradford Book, MIT Press.

Klatzky, R.L., Looms, J.M., Golledge & Cincinelli, R.G. (1990). Acquisition for route and souevay knowledge in the absence of vision. Journal of motor behavior 22, 1, 19- 43.

Lavie, N., Driver, J. (1996). On the spatial extent of attention in object-based visual selection. Perceptual Psychophysics, 58, 1238-1251.

Levi, D.M., Klein, S.A., & Carney, T. (2000). Unmasking the mechanisms for Vernier acuity: Evidence for a template model of Vernier acuity. Vision Research, 40, 951–972

Levi, D.M., Hariharan, S., & Klein, S.A. (2002). Suppressive and facilitator spatial interactions in peripheral vision: Peripheral crowding is neither size invariant nor simple contrast masking. Journal of Vision, 2, 2, 167-177, retrieved online at http://journalofvision.org/2/2/3/.

Linn, M., & Petersen, A. (1985). Emergence and characterization of sex differences in spatial ability: A meta-analysis. Child Development, 56, 1479-1498.

Loke, W.H., & Song S. (1991). Central and peripheral visual processing in hearing and nonhearing individuals. Bull Psychonom Soc, 29:437-440.

Loomis, J.M., Klatzky, R.L., Philbeck, W., & Golledge, R.G. (1998). Assessing auditory distance perception using perceptually directed action. Perception and Psychophysics, 60, 6, 966-980.

Manton, K.G. (1989). Epidemiological demographic, and social correlates of disability among the eldery. The Milbank Quarterly, 67 (Suppl. 2), Pt. 1, 13-58.

Murray-Leslie, C., (1991). Driving for the person disabled by arthritis. Journal of Rheumatology, 30, 54- 55.

Pirkl J.J., & Babic, A.L. (1988). Guidelines and Strategies for Designing Transgenerational Products: An Instructor's Manual. Centre for Instructional Development, Syracuse University, Syracuse.

Pylyshyn, Z.W. (1998). Visual indexes in spatial vision and imagery. In R. D. Wright (Ed.), Visual Attention, New York: Oxford University Press, 215-231.

Pylyshyn, Z.W., & Cohen, J. (1999). Imagined extrapolation of uniform motion is not continuous. Paper presented at the Annual Conference of the Association for Research in Vision and Ophthalmology, Ft. Lauderdale, FL.

Pylyshyn, Z.W. (2000). Situating vision in the world, Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 4, 5, 197-207.

Pylyshyn, Z.W. (2001a). Connecting vision and the world: Tracking the missing link. In J. Branquinho (Ed.), The Foundations of Cognitive Science. Oxford, UK: Claredon Press.

Schuhfried, G. (1992). Wienna Test System, GmB Austria.

Shute, R.H. and Woodhouse, J.G. (1990) Visual fitness to drive after stroke or head injury. Ophthalmic and Physiological Optics . 10, 327-332.

Siegel, M., Kording, P.K., & Kording, P. (2000). Integrating Top-Down and Bottom-Up Sensory Processing by Somato-Dendritic Interactions. Journal of Computational Neuroscience, 8, 161-173.

Smith, E., Fredrickson, B., Loftus, G. R., & Noelen-Hoeksema, S., (2004). Introduction to Psychology, Bucureşti: Ed. Tehnică.

Stins, J.F., & van Leeuwen, C. (1993). Context influence on the perception of figures as conditional upon perceptual organization strategies. Percept. Psychophysics. 53, 34-42.

Wang, Q., Cavanagh, P., & Green, M. (1994). Familiarity and pop-out in visual search. Perception & Psychophysics, 56, 495-500.


Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.




Copyright (c) 2015 Mihai Aniţei, Cornel Mincu, Mihaela Chraif



Asociatia de Psihologie Industriala si Organizationala
Strada Grigore Moisil, nr. 42, sector 2, București, cod poștal 023796

Creative Commons License
This work by Psihologia Resurselor Umane is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at pru.apio.ro.