Adaptarea românească a Setului Internațional de Itemi de Personalitate: IPIP-Ro

Dragoș Iliescu, Marian Popa, Roxana Dimache


Acest articol documentează traducerea în limba română a băncii de itemi pentru evaluarea personalității, IPIP. În banca de itemi IPIP-Ro sunt conținuți 2504 itemi pentru evaluarea personalității, care compun un număr de 371 de scale de personalitate, grupate pe 19 categorii. Cei 2504 itemi au fost administrați unui eșantion de conveniență de 282 de participanți, iar articolul documentează procesul de traducere, precum și caracteristicile psihometrice ale celor 371 de scale, dintre care 250 pot fi utilizate fără rețineri pentru cercetare, având o fidelitate de .70 sau peste. Sunt discutate implicațiile acestui proiect pentru cercetarea personalității în România, precum și limitările proiectului și scalelor cuprinse în banca de itemi, pentru utilizarea în practica psihologică.


IPIP; evaluarea personalității; teste


Allport, G. W. (1960). Becoming: Basic Considerations for a Psychology of Personality. New Haven: Yale University Press.

Ashton, M. C., Lee, K., Perugini, M., Szarota, P., De Vries, R. E., Di Blas, L., Boies, K., & De Raad, B. (2004). A Six-factor Structure of Personality-descriptive Adjectives: Solutions from Psycholexical Studies in Seven Languages. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 86, 356-366.

Baldasaro, R. E., Shanahan, M. J., & Bauer, D. J. (2013). Psychometric properties of the mini-IPIP in a large, nationally representative sample of young adults. Journal of Personality Assessment, 95, 74-84.

Barrick, M. R, & Mount, M.K. (1991). The Big Five personality dimensions and job performance: A meta-analysis. Personnel Psychology, 44, 1-26.

Block, J. (1995). A contrarian view of the five-factor approach to personality description. Psychological Bulletin, 117, 187-215.

Buss, D. M., & Craik, K. H. (1980). The frequency concept of disposition: Dominance and prototypically dominant acts. Journal of Personality, 48, 379-392.

Buss, D. M., & Craik, K. H. (1986). The act frequency approach and the construction of personality. In A. Angleitner, A. Furnham, & G. van Heck (Eds.), Personality psychology in Europe: Vol. 2. Current trends and controversies (pp. 141-156). Lisse, The Netherlands: Swets & Zeitlinger.

Conn, S.R., & Rieke, M. L. (1994). The 16PF fifth edition tehnical manual. Champaign, IL: Institute for Personality and Ability Testing.

Costa, P.T., & McCrae, R.R. (1992). Revised NEO Personality Inventory (NEO-PI-R) and NEO Five-Factor Inventory (NEO-FFI) professional manual. Odessa, FL: Psychological Assessment Resources.

Donnellan, M. B., Oswald, F. L., Baird, B. M., & Lucas (2006). The Mini-IPIP Scales: Tiny-yet-effective measures of the Big Five Factors of Personality. Psychological Assessment 18, 192-203.

Ehrhart, K. H., Roesch, S. C., Ehrhart, M. G., & Kilian, B. (2008). A test of the factor structure equivalence of the 50-item IPIP Five-factor model measure across gender and ethnic groups. Journal of Personality Assessment 90, 507-516.

Eysenck, H. J., & Eysenck, M. W. (1985). Personality and individual differences: a natural science approach. Plenum: New York.

Goldberg, L. R. (1999). A broad-bandwidth, public-domain, personality inventory measuring the lower-level facets of several five-factor models. In I. Mervielde, I. Deary, F. De Fruyt, & F. Ostendorf (Eds.), Personality psychology in Europe, Vol. 7 (pp. 7-28). Tilburg, The Netherlands: Tilburg University Press.

Goldberg, L. R., Johnson, J. A., Eber, H. W., Hogan, R., Ashton, M. C., Cloninger, C. R., & Gough, H. C. (2006). The International Personality Item Pool and the future of public-domain personality measures. Journal of Research in Personality, 40, 84-96.

Gough, H. G., & Bradley, P. (1996). The California Psychological Inventory Manual (Third Edition). Palo Alto, CA: Consulting Psychologists Press.

Gow, A. J., Whiteman, M. C., Pattie, A., & Deary, I. J. (2005). Goldberg's 'IPIP' Big-Five factor markers: Internal consistency and concurrent validation in Scotland. Personality and Individual Defferences, 39, 317-329.

Guion, R. M., & Gottier, R.F. (1965). Validity of Personality Measures in Personnel Selection. Personnel Psychology, 18, 135-164.

Hambleton, R. K. (2005). Issues, Designs, and Technical Guidelines for Adapting Tests into Multiple Languages and Cultures. In R. K. Hambleton, P. F. Merenda, & C. D. Spielberger (eds.) Adapting Educational and Psychological Tests for Cross-Cultural Assessment (pp. 3-38). New Jersey: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Hough, L. M. (1998). Personality at work: Issues and evidence. In M. D. Hakel (Ed.), Beyond multiple choice: Evaluating alternatives to traditional testing for selection (pp. 131-166). Mahwah, NJ: Lawrence Erlbaum.

Hough, L., & Dilchert, S. (2010). Personality: Its Measurement and Validity for Employee Selection. In J. L. Farr & N. T. Tippins (Eds.), Handbook of Employee Selection (pp. 299-319). New York: Routledge.

Hough, L.M., & Furnham, A. (2003). Use of personality variables in work settings. In W.C. Borman, D. R. Ilgen & R. J. Klimoski (Eds.). Handbook of psychology. Vol. 12: Industrial and organizational psychology. (pp. 131-169). Hoboken, NJ: John Wiley & Sons.

International Personality Item Pool: A Scientific Collaboratory for the Development of Advanced Measures of Personality Traits and Other Individual Differences ( Internet Web Site.

International Test Commission (2008). International Test Commission Guidelines for Translating and Adapting Tests. [].

Maples, J. L., Guan, L., Carter, N. T., & Miller, J. D. (2014). A Test of the International Personality Item Pool representation of the Revised NEO Personality Inventory and development of a 120-item IPIP-based measure of the five-factor model. Psychological Assessment, 26, 1070-1084.

Markey, P. M., & Markey C. N. (2009). A brief assessment of the interpersonal circumplex: The IPIP-IPC. Assessment 16, 352-361.

Markey, P., Anderson, J. M., & Markey, C. (2013). Using Behavioral Mapping to Examine the Validity of the IPIP-IPC. Assessment 20, 165-174.

McAbee, S. T., & Oswald, F. L. (2013). The criterion-related validity of personality measures for predicting GPA: a meta-analytic validity competition. Psychological Assessment 25, 532-544.

Megargee, E. I., Bogart, P., & Anderson, B. J. (1966). Prediction of leadership in a simulated industrial task. Journal of Applied Psychology, 50, 292-295.

Ones, D. S., Viswesvaran, C., & Dilchert, S. (2005). Personality at work: Raising awareness and correcting misconceptions. Human Performance, 18, 389-404.

Pitariu, H. & Iliescu, D. (2004). Inventarul Psihologic California – CPI260-Ro [Romanian adaptation of the California Psychological Inventory], Psihologia Resurselor Umane, 2, 40-49.

Rusu, S., Maricutoiu, L. P., Macsinga, I., Vîrga, D., & Sava, F. A. (2012). Evaluarea personalita?ii din perspectiva modelului Big Five. Date privind adaptarea chestionarului IPIP-50 pe un e?antion de studen?i romani. Psihologia Resurselor Umane, 10, 39 -56.

Schneider, R. J., Hough, L. M., & Dunnette, M. D. (1996). Broadsided by broad traits: How to sink science in five dimensions or less. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 17, 639-655.

Tett, R. P., Jackson, D. N., & Rothstein, M. (1991). Personality measures as predictors of job performance: A meta-analytic review. Personnel Psychology, 44, 703-742.

Zuckerman, M., Kuhlman, D. M., & Camac, C. (1988). What lies beyond E and N? Factor analyses of scales believed to measure basic dimensions of personality. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 54, 96-107.


  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2015 Dragoș Iliescu, Marian Popa, Roxana Dimache

Asociatia de Psihologie Industriala si Organizationala
Strada Grigore Moisil, nr. 42, sector 2, București, cod poștal 023796

Creative Commons License
This work by Psihologia Resurselor Umane is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-NonCommercial-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
Based on a work at